User talk:Taivo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi! I saw you declined my request to delete the images of the supposed "Ethiopian crosses"

[edit]

Could you maybe merge them with the Syriac cross or rename them to "West Syriac" or "Assyrian" cross? They aren't Ethiopian anyways. MotorolaBoy (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I am not specialist of crosses, despite my name. I do not want to rename the file, because I am not sure, which kind of cross is it. Per COM:INUSE the file cannot be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't know how I could convince you. Maybe if I brought a primary source about the style of a west Syriac cross? And I neither know where nor how to. I just dislike it being named that as it's historically inaccurate and that symbol historically represented the Assyrian (Oriental Orthodox Christian) rite west of the Euphrates, whereas something resembling File:Eastern Syriac Cross.svg was used to the east. An actual Ethiopian cross would be File:Krest Lalibeli.png, which is used on the EN Wikipedia EOTC page. MotorolaBoy (talk) 10:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not the only person who can rename files. You need any file renamer here. Please open COM:RENAME about how to rename files and the page consists link to all file movers (currently 1635). Taivo (talk) 10:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will do! MotorolaBoy (talk) 11:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taivo, in my view this image is both ineligible for copyright and too old for copyright. The PNG version should be restored. --Leyo 08:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. But I do not think so. Not made of simple geometrical figures. It can be too old for copyright protection, but for that either anonymous work or author's death more than 70 years ago must be proven. Of course you can make an undeletion request. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category Estonians

[edit]

Hi, what do you think about this, is that a proper categorization? Thanks --A.Savin 17:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

, No, I reverted the edit. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2020 discussion was closed as keep with a rationale from you that CC-BY-SA license is valid, because it has OTRS license.

I can't access the OTRS file - can I double-check with you that the original artist @strayrogue gave approval for GiraffeWorld to make a "close redraw" COM:DERIV drawing based on the original work, in that OTRS statement? Or was the OTRS just GiraffeWorld saying that they were releasing their own drawing under that licence?

(I'm surprised that the original artist didn't just release their own drawing as CC-BY, if they were happy for someone to basically trace it and take the author credit, so I'm wondering if something got missed here.) Belbury (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I do not know. I am not OTRS/VRT member and have never been. I simply assumed, that if the file has the permission, then it is valid. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check image 2

[edit]

@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio José Antonio Páez Estado Apure.png (Notas:Según el sitio web dice: contenido de la comunidad está disponible bajo CC-BY-SA a menos que se indique lo contrario.) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Sorry, I was yesterday very busy. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo:Ok,gracias y una cosa chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio Rio Negro Estado Amazonas.jpg
AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio Urdaneta Estado Bolivariano de Miranda (2023).jpg
AbchyZa22 (talk) 05:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen (File:1994. Febrero, 7. Rafael Caldera en su segunda presidencia.jpg)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinión

[edit]

@Taivo: Buenas,dime una opinión con respecto a este Commons:Village pump/Copyright#PD-Venezuela and older works?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for lifting unblock conditions

[edit]

Hello,

Over a year ago (on April 12, 2023), you forbade me to ping anyone or mention Wiktionary, as you wrote on my talkpage. Now that one year has passed, can you please lift those two conditions? You said I could make that request after one year, which has already passed.

And by the way, when it comes to your English, you really should note that:

  • 1. The following question of mine
    Why exactly is "soliciting proxy edits on [my] behalf" (for any project for which I'm blocked) considered disruptive? See, the reason I did that in the past was to try to ensure that I wouldn't feel the temptation to evade a block. So if block evasion is disruptive, why would soliciting proxy edits on another WMF wiki be equally disruptive?? I do not plan to do that again, but I'd love to know why something done to prevent one's potential block-evasion is "disruption".
    should have been answered with (at the very least) the reply
    Asking others to edit a wiki, where you are blocked, is prohibited as abusing multiple accounts.
  • 2. You wrote here that "Ya" – such word is not in my dictionary and even by context I do not understand, what it means.
    What dictionary were you even using? Seriously - why can you not use English Wiktionary to decipher that word?? Because that is what I would have done in your case.
  • 3. If you have reason to think or suspect that a Commons user is a monolingual English speaker, it might be best to have other people (I suggest fluent English speakers like Yann) to give them unblock-conditions in the future.

Lastly, two final questions:

  • 2. What, in your opinion, would be the best way for me to appeal my TPA being revoked on a different WMF project? In a related issue, I still do not know how I can possibly ask Surjection a question without him reverting it as "long-term cross-wiki pestering".

Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. OK.
  2. en:Johannes Silvet, "Inglise-eesti sõnaraamat", 5th edition. 2 volumes, circa 80 000 words. Publisher Valgus. 1st volume Tallinn 1991, ISBN 5–440–01310–5, 2nd volume Tallinn 1992, ISBN 5–440–01311–3.
  3. Maybe, but you understood me enough well anyway.
  4. I have no opinion on this question.
  5. I thought, that such blocks should be appealed in Meta, but I could not find a proper place there. You can search yourself as well. The problem is in Wiktionary, which has own administrators and procedures, so normally requests must be made in Wiktionary user talkpage, but as your talkpage access is removed, it seems to me, that there's nothing you can do. You do not know, how to ask Surjection a question – I do not know that either. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Personally, if I were you, I would ask Surjection something like this:
    "Hello, do you think there's any way that Shāntián Tàiláng can send you a message (or ask you a question), without him pestering you? I am worried that he won't be able to communicate with you at all, if you keep reverting his messages. One day, he might genuinely need your input on a topic. So how would you want him to communicate with you, if that were the case?" Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 15:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not ask that due to two reasons: at first I am not worried at all and at second I am not interested in it. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kustutamise ränka tööd

[edit]

Palun kustuta: File:Viimsi Artiumi pidulik avamine 19. augustil 2022.jpg & File:Klindi servalt Viimsi Artiumi katuseterrasile viivad sillad.jpg. Fotograaf keeldus loa andmisest. Kruusamägi (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saku õlletehasest saime hulga pilte. Nüüd selle foto juures mõeldi natuke ja leiti, et see oleks siiski parem kustutada. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See fail on varastatud Kaupo Kaldalt. Originaal. Fotograaf palus kiirelt kustuta. Nähtavasti on AÕ rikkumine ka selle kasutaja lisatud teine foto. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Siin on kaks kunstiteost (x1 ja x2), kus kunstniku surmast pole veel 70 aastat möödas ja seepärast ei saa me paraku neid Commonsis hoida. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Palun kustutada see. Kui metaandmeid vaadata, siis näib, et inimene on enda kollektsioonist pilte Commonsisse andes kogemata kellegi teise foto kah lisaks andnud. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kasutaja AsiakBanksy lisatud fotod on kõik AÕ rikkumise alla arvatavad ja vajaks kustutamist. Kruusamägi (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kustutasingi nad kõik ja hoiatasin kasutajat. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Buenas,está foto deberia quedarse (kept) o borrarse (deleted)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

logo of Venados FC

[edit]
File:Venados F.C. logo.svg

I uploaded the logo of Venados FC, Is the license correct for it to be on Wikimedia Commons? Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 00:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Should be correct. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Can you please help me export more logos of the Mexican soccer teams please?, the site doesn't let me export . They have the correct licenses.
Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 13:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. I got error message "Can't import file because at least one of its file revisions is hidden." I am not administrator in en.wiki, so I cannot do anything about that. You can try exporting the logos which have no hidden revisions. Also in my opinion you can simply re-upload the logos without importing. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo Okay, thanks for helping me. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Buenas,esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. I commented. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo:The source:https://impuestospedrazabar.guiriri.com.ve/contactus AbchyZa22 (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept) AbchyZa22 (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AbchyZa22: I closed the DR. But after that I started to think: maybe you can give source link? I will review the DR, if you have the source link. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: Ok,gracias pero por favor cierra el DR (Commons:Deletion requests/File:LOGO SEAMAT.png tengo las fuentes (source)) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Taivo, I want to ask, can you restore the flag file to the previous version, namely the version dated September 27, 2023? This version is the flag version used by the government, before an editing war started by an irresponsible editor and then you were forced to protect it indefinitely. I also think that protecting these files is the right thing to do. Thank you. -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 08:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can, but I do not know, which version the government uses. There's no proper source link. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Taivo, this is one of the example proof of its usage by the Government of Central Java Province. Link (in Indonesian): https://regional.kompas.com/read/2020/11/25/17362011/jateng-jadi-provinsi-paling-informatif-ganjar-beberkan-kunci-suksesnya. -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 10:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Taivo, I would like to know, have you considered my proposal regarding the Central Java provincial flag file? Thank you. -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 07:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. I am not sure, that the flag on the photo is an official flag. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Buenas, por favor cierra el Deletion Request,tengo las fuentes AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. After the file was given real source, I could keep the file. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You gave them an {{Endofcopyvios}} warning some time ago. It appears that they must believe that such warnings expire. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. One week block, the copyvio is deleted. I also deleted some empty categories. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please place my request to remove protection of the file at the COM:ANU to continue discussion about the possible deletion, which was aborted without arguments and contrary to almost all opinions. Thank you. 188.123.231.32 18:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Instead, I nominated the file again for regular deletion. Taivo (talk) 18:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. --188.123.231.32 18:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File talk:Taras Hladun i Jarosław Kaczyński w Rocznicę Katastrofy Smoleńskiej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taras Sh123 (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Taivo, can you please delete File:Taras Hladun i Jarosław Kaczyński w Rocznicę Katastrofy Smoleńskiej.jpg (File:Taras Hladun i Jarosław Kaczyński w Rocznicę Katastrofy Smoleńskiej.jpg), because of copyright rules. I didnt have rights to upload this photo. I am on this photo, but I am not an owner of the rights. And this photo has also bad, uncorrect description. Taras Sh123 (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licence check

[edit]

Can you please check the licence for following as you did for this. File:Satyadeo Singh Kushwaha.jpgAdmantine123 (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. Admantine123 (talk) 00:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licence

[edit]

Hi, can you mark these images too for licence check.File:Nitish Kumar with newly appointed members of Lok Sabha in 2024.jpg & File:Samratchoudhary.jpg This is because the government of bihar website is dynamic in nature and they remove old images after few years when next election comes. Here like this, File:Umesh kushwaha, khiru Mahto, Nitish Kumar.jpeg, many images were reviewed earlier by other administrators. Please review this image too from same website as I will get the extracted images of many parliamentarians from this single pic. Admantine123 (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that in future someone can nominate it for delition if it is not found in source. This website doesn't allow archiving. See this another image from same website reviewed by another Indian administrator File:Revenue minister Alok Mehta.jpg, File:Nitish Kumar participating in Ram Navmi Shobha Yatra.jpg. The website policy can be read here.[1].Admantine123 (talk) 12:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed one file. The other had incorrect source (file was not found behind the link) and I nominated it for deletion. You have one week to correct the source. Taivo (talk) 13:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually you will have to click twice on that link. It usually points directly to website and on that website it is available under commercial tax ministry link which is at the below of page. [https://state.bihar.gov.in/biharcommercialtax/CitizenHome.html Admantine123 (talk) 14:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Thank you, now I reviewed this file as well. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for your quick review. Admantine123 (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Is this flickrwashed image by Claude Renault, it was formerly licensed as Creative Commons before changing to copyright (as per fair use), but now it was deleted on Flickr. [Derogatory last sentence censored – Taivo]. 2001:4452:11E:F200:6849:CCEC:B321:3698 14:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. This is vandalistic nomination. I closed the DR speedily, blocked the nominator and semi-protected the file indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please revdel this IPs comment where he called me a xxxx, also on Eugene Zelenkos talkpage. --Denniss (talk) 21:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done on the same day. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. I will comment. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grafiti

[edit]

Ole hea ja sulge see mittetarvilik taotlus. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing a page move

[edit]

Hello Taivo, I am writing here because the original page mover is no longer active. Could you revert File:Mathews Phosa 1997 (cropped).jpg back to its original name? The different year was due to a translation error. Thanks, Joofjoof (talk) 06:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query

[edit]

Why was this page deleted after another user refuted the original proposition? No Swan So Fine (talk) 07:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per {{NoFoP-Saudi Arabia}}, there's no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. And even Yafa.naif said: "The freedom of Panorama does not exist either". You can look at COM:FOP Saudi Arabia for more. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why aren't Wikimedia projects considered educational by that definition? I find the whole thing fascinating! No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course each and every Wikimedia project is educational. The problem is that every file in Commons must be usable for commercial purposes and Saudi Arabia does not allow photos about modern art to be freely used for that. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that's very concise. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

Please review this images uploaded by me:

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luchoxtrab (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I reverted your close. If dispute has risen, then only administrators are allowed to close requests. In addition, your close is wrong: the logo surpasses threshold of originality, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please do not remove the archive template on this file since the deletion process is now closed.

Thank you Luchoxtrab (talk) 07:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then could I have more information on that still being open? Moreover the file likely doen't fit the criteria for deletion since it is NOT a complex logo. Luchoxtrab (talk) 07:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have no information about threshold of originality in Slovakia. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously Luchoxtrab's closure of this deletion request was inappropriate, but so was your full protection of the discussion. The full protection discourages further participation from other editors. It also has the appearance that you are using your administrator tools in a dispute you are involved in. Please undo this protection. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that thing I did was totally inappropriate and I'm sorry for that, yet full protection seems a bit like admin power abuse to me. Luchoxtrab (talk) 07:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After Luchoxtrab confessed that, I agree to remove protection. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licence check

[edit]

File:Nomination of Bhagwan Singh Kushwaha (1) 01.jpg, File:Nomination of Bhagwan Singh Kushwaha (1) 03.jpg, File:Nomination of Bhagwan Singh Kushwaha (1) 02.jpg can you mark these as checked. It is from same government of Bihar website. Admantine123 (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kedargupta (1) (1).jpg. too.Admantine123 (talk) 13:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]